There should be no difference if you are performing a block level backup/image. I really don't know - Yes and No, I am guessing the problem with Acronis is simply an artificial limitation because they sell a server version. Ghost should come with a utility that allows you to access these disks. Not directly, the images you burn will simply be the data needed for a recovery. So, unless Linux is covered under GPT, the answer would be no. the only program I consider anywhere near Ghost would be Drive Snapshot.įrom the system requirements First question. Ghost is still the reference and 'industry standard'. On a personal note: I have cloned thousands of drives with Ghost, it never failed me. The command line switch -PMBR specifies that the master boot record of the destination disk be preserved when performing a Disk-to-Disk or Image-to-Disk operation.įor more information about Ghost, I recommend the Radified Guide to Norton Ghost: Give the option of including/excluding the MBR? Symantec Ghost will clone any Windows drive/partition (even when encrypted with BitLocker, but Ghost will switch to 'sector mode' and the images will be accordingly large in size). No, Ghost.exe works in a DOS environment, however, for better controller controller support I recommend Ghost32.exe from within a Windows environment (e.g. Yes, Symantec Ghost added support for the ext2 filesystem in 1999 and for ext3 subsequently. Not their consumer product with the same name which has derived from "PowerQuest Drive Image" but has got in common with the 'real deal'. Just for the record, I will answer your questions based on Ghost (the Enterprise Edition),
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |